|
Anthrax,
Chemicals and Nerve Gas: Who is Lying?
Growing evidence of deception by Washington
by Andrew Gumbel in Los Angeles
Published on Sunday, April 20, 2003 by the lndependent/UK
If
US and British forces are scratching their heads at their inability
to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, perhaps they should
talk to Scott Ritter, the United Nations weapons inspector who famously
quit in 1998, after seven years on the job, and has been a controversial
figure ever since.
For
months, Mr Ritter has said Iraq's capability of producing or deploying
chemical or biological weapons was 90-95 per cent destroyed on his
watch and was very unlikely to have been built up again under international
sanctions and the constant surveillance of spy satellites and US
and British war planes.
Iraq's
nuclear program was dismantled at the end of the first Gulf War
in 1991, he said, and factories to produce chemical or biological
agents deactivated shortly thereafter. Any leftover nerve agents
would only have a shelf life of five years and would probably be
useless by now. The anthrax and botulism toxin that Iraq produced
was never weaponized and, although it was put into warheads at one
point, was no more than harmless sludge that "could only kill
you if it landed on your head".
This
is the same Scott Ritter who, when he first made these assertions
last autumn, was vilified in the US media as "misguided",
"disloyal", not to be taken seriously and "an apologist
for and a defender of Saddam Hussein". One cable news host,
Curtis Sliwa said on air he was a "sock puppet" who "ought
to turn in his passport for an Iraqi one".
Perhaps
it's time to give Mr Ritter another chance. It may, in fact, be
time to reassess who exactly has been the deceiver and who the dupe
in this whole affair. What Mr Ritter and others now allege, with
increasing confidence, is a pattern of false information emanating
from both Washington and London since last September lies
and distortions that launched a major war and are only now beginning
to be widely exposed.
Exhibit
number one is a speech Vice President Dick Cheney gave to the Veterans
of Foreign Wars last summer. "The Iraqi regime has in fact
been very busy enhancing its capabilities in the field of chemical
and biological agents." he said. "And they continue to
pursue the nuclear program they began so many years ago." Mr
Ritter says this is pure fiction.
Mr
Cheney attributed his information to high-level defectors, including
Saddam's son-in-law, Hussein Kamal. Supposedly, Kamal led UN inspectors
in 1995 to a chicken farm stuffed with secret documents on ongoing
weapons programs. Actually, according to Mr Ritter, Hussein Kamal
told US intelligence that the weapons had been destroyed, and the
chicken farm documents subsequently examined by UN inspectors corroborated
that.
Exhibit
number two is the briefing paper issued by Downing Street on 24
September, which first alleged the purchase of uranium for nuclear
weapons use from Niger. The documents indicating this purchase have
now been exposed by the International Atomic Energy Agency as glaringly
obvious fakes.
The
timing of the nuclear allegation was crucial in persuading the US
Congress to grant President Bush full war powers against Iraq a
few weeks later. Several angry congressmen who voted in favor now
want to know how and why they were misled.
"This
is a breach of the highest order, and the American people are entitled
to know how it happened," Henry Waxman of California wrote
to the President last month. "I believed that you had access
to reliable intelligence information that merited deference... The
two most obvious explanations knowing deception or unfathomable
incompetence both have immediate and serious implications."
Exhibit
number three is the list of dangerous substances that President
Bush and Colin Powell, the Secretary of State, said the Iraqis had
not accounted for. Another distortion, according to Mr Ritter. The
15,000 liters of anthrax on the list, for example, was a hypothetical
projection of future production at a biological plant that was closed
down long ago.
Mr
Ritter has not, of course, been vindicated quite yet. US intelligence
may really know something, and significant hidden caches of weapons
could still materialize. But the pattern of deception and unsubstantiated
allegation is unmistakable, even as the political embarrassment
for the Bush administration deepens.
©
2003 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd.
|